[1]
Rodríguez Escanciano, S. 2025. Flexibility in the interpretation of the requirement of correspondence between the content of the conciliation letter and the content of the demand: Commentary on Supreme Court Ruling 49/2025, 23 January. Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. CEF. 487 (Jul. 2025), 164–174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2025.24671.