Auto de abordaje con registro de camarote y cuestiones de competencia judicial en relación con el derecho a un juez predeterminado por la ley

Abstract

He does not refuse that a berth can be a domicile when it is reserved for the intimate life, excluding third persons, but one denies to him the constitutional protection of the judicial motivated resolution, when inside the same one there develops an improper activity of the purpose of the domicile. The judicial resolution of boarding, even if it does not contain the judicial express authorization of the record of the berth, it does not prevent and is void the record practised by everything all that remains exposed.

Relation exists between the judge predetermined by the law and the competition of the same one with constitutional connotations, but a possible constitutional violation will happen when there avoids unduly a reason of the ordinary jurisdiction to attribute it to a special organ, of a special jurisdiction. When the dispute centres on the interpretation of the competition between two organs of the same jurisdictional ordinary order, the major or minor success or the omission of the application of a procedural norm on competition, he does not suppose violation of the article 24.2 of the Constitution. The system of resources or the article 666 about previous procedural questions of the Law of Criminal Prosecution, they are the riverbeds adapted to solve the question.