Practical intervention in criminal interrogations during the investigation stage

Abstract

This study delves into the peculiarities that must follow the practice of interrogation when performed during the investigation stage through a proposal that combines the elements and offer guarantees with purely procedural decisions for the respective tactics of counsel, the function prosecutors and the judge. It provides a list of situations and patterns of speech that distinguishes the figure which is involved in the investigative phase. Article part of the nature of the preliminary investigation phase and its implications in the way of putting the interrogative inquiry precisely during this interval. They highlight both treatment and validation of measures obtained during the record as to its consideration as evidence in the judgment after trial, with a stop to cases of absences, retractions or contradictions or silences explored by the at the trial about what deposed in the summary stage, as evidenced, in order to provide guidance as to the full performance of the lawyers who attend criminal proceedings, guided by intervention from the start of proceedings. All that aims to provide the criminal process more efficient.