Measures about agreements adopted by the competition authorities worldwide by reason of the covid-19 (from March to July 2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51302/ceflegal.2020.9531Keywords:
covid-19, antitrust, authorities of competition, adopted measures, agreements, flexibility, strengtheningAbstract
Because of the different strategies and measures implemented and developed around the globe by national, supranational and international authorities of competition, in response to the crisis created by the covid-19, this paper presents, through a material –non-territorial– approach, the characteristics, similarities and differences of those approaches and the substantive and procedural criteria of the antitrust, that support or discourage their implementation and their extension beyond initial phases, of higher impact, provoked by the pandemic.
Downloads
References
Buccirossi, Paolo, Ciari, Lorenzo, Duso, Tomaso, Spagnolo, Giancarlo y Vitale, Cristiana. (2009). Deterrence in Competition Law. Discussion Paper, 285, presentado en la Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems. http://www.sfbtr15.de/dipa/285.pdf
Jones, Alison y Sufrin, Brenda. (2019). EC Competition Law. Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford University Press.
Lande, Robert H. (2004). Five Myths about antitrust damages. University of San Francisco Law Review, 40.
Naidu, Lerisha y Nxumalo, Sphesihle. (2020). African Competition Authorities Respond to the COVID-19 Crisis.
Ortiz Laverde, Sandra y Soto Pineda, Jesús Alfonso. (2017). Análisis del poder disuasorio de la protección de la libre competencia en Colombia: norma jurídica y autoridad pública. Díkaion, 26, 2.
Soto Pineda, Jesús Alfonso. (2014). La defensa de la competencia y el alcance de las ayudas públicas en el marco de los tratados de libre comercio. Vniversitas, 128.
Stefano, Gianni de (5 de mayo de 2020). Ecompetition Law: Bring the Informal Guidance On. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice.
