The incentive effect of investment in subsidies to SMEs and their controversial interpretation. The case of Andalusia

Authors

  • Francisco A. Aranguren Baena Economista. Verificador de Fondos Europeos en la Agencia IDEA (Junta de Andalucía) Profesor de la Universidad de Córdoba (UCO) (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/ceflegal.2020.9701

Keywords:

incentive effect, SMEs, subsidies, jurisprudence

Abstract

In the different public financial support programs for SMEs, the so-called «incentive effect of investment» is becoming the most difficult obligation for the beneficiary to fulfill, given, in practice, its legal indeterminacy. This article, framed in the issue of the alleged administrative simplification, tries to show the statu quo of the controversy and to define its scope and conceptual realization, through the analysis of the experience of Andalusia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ara, I. (2004). Presupuestos y posibilidades de la doctrina de los conceptos jurídicos indeterminados. Anuario de filosofía del Derecho, 21, 107-124.

Endicott, T. A. O. (2007). La vaguedad en el derecho. Madrid: Dykinson (Orig. 2006).

Núñez, M. (2013). Los conceptos jurídicos indeterminados: la mercadería. Controversias y soluciones, Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional.

Published

2020-01-10

How to Cite

Aranguren Baena, F. A. (2020). The incentive effect of investment in subsidies to SMEs and their controversial interpretation. The case of Andalusia. CEFLegal. Revista práctica De Derecho, (228), 81–114. https://doi.org/10.51302/ceflegal.2020.9701

Issue

Section

Comentarios doctrinales y jurisprudenciales. Constitucional-administrativo