Do the welfare state models affect work-life balance for female worker with children? The moderator role of gender as cultural value in Europe

Authors

  • Ana María Lucia Casademunt Profesora titular de Gestión Empresarial. Universidad Loyola Andalucía (España)
  • María José Oteros Ruiz Máster Universitario en Métodos de Investigación en Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Universidad Loyola Andalucía. Licenciada en Administración y Dirección de Empresas y en Investigación y Técnicas de Mercados. Universidad de Córdoba (España)
  • Gloria Martínez Cousinou Profesora auxiliar del Departamento de Estudios Internacionales. Universidad Loyola Andalucía (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2017.1774

Keywords:

welfare state models, work-life balance, institutional theory, national culture, correlations and lineal regression models

Abstract

In the recent years is commonly usual the presence of women in the labour market and it brings to light the pressing need of making quotidian those work-life balance practices that really would make easier a deep integration attending to their life cycle. In this sense, it is original and relevant to make a global analysis of the different variables (such as Welfare State models, national culture in the dimension of gender egalitarianism and work-life balance policies) which from the moment has been observed in an isolated way. In order to achieve this objective, the question setting out is if the different insitutional desings affect in a determining way relating to the practices and policies of Human Resources (HHRR) that are designed and implemented in organizations, Moreover, for this affectation, our aim is to notice the value of the cultural variable masculinity/femininity through the different European countries. So, an empirical analysis is developed with a sample of 5.775 European working women. The results confirm the impact of the different institutional desings on the level of development of work-life balance practices for the European organizations analyzed. However, the general idea that in the Socialdemocratic countries the work-life balance has more importance than in the Postcomunist countries doesn´t work for the expected effect that the Welfare State should present for this kind of countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, T.; Herst, D.; Bruck, C. S. y Sutton, M. [2000]: «Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: a review and agenda for future research», Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, vol. 5, págs. 278-308.

Allen, T. D.; French, K. A.; Dumani, S. y Shockley, K. M. [2015]: «Meta-analysis of work-family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter?», Journal of vocational behaviour, vol. 90, págs. 90-100.

Boje, T. P.; Ejrnæs, A; Torres, A; Trifiletti, R. y Salmieri, L. [2007]: WORKCARE. Social Quality and the Changing Relationship between Work, Care and Welfare in Europe, caps. 3 y 4, págs. 87-109.

Boucher, G. [2013]: European social cohesions. Patterns of Prejudice, vol. 47, núm. 3, págs. 215-234.

Bouget, D. [2006]: «Convergence in Social Welfare Systems: From Evidence to explanations», European Journal of social quality, vol. 6, núm. 1, págs. 109-126.

Chen, Z. X.; Tsui, A. S. y Zhong, L. [2008]: «Reactions to psychological contract breach: a dual perspective», Journal of organizational behavior, vol. 9, págs. 527-548.

Clark, S. C. [2001]: «Work cultures and work-family balance», Journal of vocational Behavior, vol. 58, págs. 348-365.

Deacon, B. [1993]: «Developments in East European social policy», Jones, C. (edit.), New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe, London: Routledge.

Dean, H.; Bonvin, J. M.; Vielle, P. y Farvaque, N. [2005]: «Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies», European societies, vol. 7, núm. 1, págs. 3-26.

DiMaggio, P. J. y Powell, W. W. [1999]: El nuevo institucionalismo en el análisis organizacional (introducción), México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

— [1983] «The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields», American Sociological Reviews, vol. 48, núm. 2, págs. 147-160.

Dommermuth, L. y Kitterød, R. H. [2009]: «Fathers' employment in a father-friendly welfare state: does fatherhood affect men's working hours?», Community, Work & Family, vol. 12, núm. 4, págs. 417-436.

Elsbach, K. y Sutton, R. [1992]: «Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: a marriage of institutional and impression Management theories», Academy of Management Journal, vol. 35, núm. 4, págs. 699-738.

Esping-Andersen, G. [2000]: Fundamentos sociales de las economías posindustriales, Ariel (ed.).

— [1990]: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press.

Estes, S. B.; Noonan, M. C. y Maume, D. J. [2007]: «Is Work-Family Policy Use Related to the Gendered Division of HOUSEwork?», Journal of Family Economy, vol. 28, págs. 527-545.

Farndale, E. y Paauwe, J. [2007]: «Uncovering competitive and institutional drivers of HRM practices in multinational corporations», Human Resources Management Journal, vol. 17, núm. 4, págs. 355-375.

Faur, E. [2006]: «Género, masculinidades y políticas de conciliación familia-trabajo», Nómadas, págs. 130-141.

Fenger, H. J. M. [2007]: «Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology», Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, vol. 3, núm. 2, págs. 1-30.

Fernández, M. L. y Valle, R. [1998]: «El enfoque neoinstitucional como marco teórico explicativo de la gestión de recursos humanos», Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 4, núm. 3, págs. 93-112.

Ferrera [1996]: «The ‘Southern model' of welfare in social Europe», Journal of European social policy, vol. 6, núm. 1, págs. 17-37.

Forma, P. [2009]: «Work, family and intentions to withdraw from the workplace», International Journal of Social Welfare, vol. 18, págs. 183-192.

Fraser, N. [1997]: Justice Interruptus: critical reflections on the «post-socialist condition», London: Routledge.

Friendland, R. y Alford, R. R. [1991]: «Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions», citado en Zona Abierta [1993], vol. 63, págs. 155-207.

Greenhaus, J. H. y Powell, G. N. [2006]: «When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment», Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, págs. 72-92.

Gregory, A. y Milner, S. [2009)]: «Work-life Balance: A Matter of Choice?», Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 16, núm. 1, págs. 1-13.

Hantrais, L. y Ackers, P. [2005]: «Women's Choices in Europe: Striking the Work-life Balance», European Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 11, núm. 2, págs. 197-212.

Hofstede, G. [1984]: «The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept», Academy of Management Review, vol. 9, núm. 3, págs. 389-398.

Hope-Hailey, V.; Kelliher, C. y Truss, C. [2004]: «Disappearing Between the Cracks: HRM in Permeable Organisations», Management Review, vol. 15, núm. 3, ABI/INFORM Global, págs. 305-323.

House, R. J.; Hanges, P. J.; Javidan, M.; Dorfman, P. W. y Gupta, V. [2004]: Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies, California: Sage Publications.

Jyrkinen, M. y Mckie, L. [2014]: «Gender, age and ageism: experiences of women managers in two EU countries», Work, employment and society, vol. 26, núm. 1, págs. 61-77.

Kalliath, T. y Brough, P. [2008]: «Work-Life Balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct», Journal of Management and Organization, vol. 1, núm. 4, págs. 323-327.

Larsen, T. P. [2004]: «Work and Care Strategies of European Families: Similarities or National Differences?», Social Policy & Administration, vol. 38, núm. 6, págs. 654-677.

Leibfried, S. [1992]: «Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community», Social Policy in a Changing Europe, Campus Verlag (ed.).

Leitner, A. y Wroblewski, A. [2006]: «Welfare states and work-life balance», European Societies, vol. 8, núm. 2, págs. 5-317.

León, M. [2005]: «Welfare State regimes and the social organization of labour: Childcare arrangements and the work/family balance dilema», The Sociological Review, vol. 53, núm. 2, págs. 204-218.

Lewis, S. y Haas, L. [2005]: Work-life integration and social policy: A Social Justice Theory and Gender Equity Approach to Work and Family, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lu, J. W. [2002]: «Intra and Inter-organizational imitative behaviour: Institutional influences on Japanese firms' entry mode choice», Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 33, núm. 1, págs. 19-37.

Lu, L.; Cooper, C. L.; Kao, S. H.; Chang, T. T.; Allen, T. D. y Lapierre, L. M. et al. [2010]: Cross cultural differences on work to family conflict and role satisfaction: a Taiwanese-British comparison, Human Resource Management, vol. 49, núm. 1, págs. 67-85.

Lyness, K. S. y Judiesch, M. K. [2008]: «Can a Manager Have a Life and a Career? International and Multisource Perspectives on Work-Life Balance and Career Advancement Potential», Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 93, núm. 4, págs. 789-805.

Lyonette, C.; Crompton, R. y Wall, K. [2007]: «Gender, occupational class and work-life conflict: A comparison of Britain and Portugal», Community, Work & Family, vol. 10, núm. 3, págs. 283-308.

Mcdowell, L. [2004]: «Work, workfare, work/life balance and an ethic of care», Progress in Human Geography, vol. 28, núm. 2, págs. 145-163.

Miller Moya, L. M. [2004]: «Participación laboral femenina y estados del bienestar», Reis. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, núm. 108, págs. 49-74.

Nishii, L. H.; Lepak, D. P. y Schneider, B. [2008]: Employee attributions of the «why» of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction, CAHRS Working Paper #08-03, Ithaca, Nueva York: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.

North, D. C. [1990]: Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press.

Öun, I. [2012]: «Work-Family Conflict in the Nordic Countries: A Comparative Analysis», Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol. 43, núm. 2, págs. 165-184.

Paauwe, J. y Boselie, P. [2003]: «Challenging “strategic HRM” and the relevance of the institutional setting», Human Resource Management Journal, vol. 13, núm. 3, págs. 56-70.

Pasamar, S. y Alegre, J. [2015]: «Adoption and use of work-life initiatives: Looking at the influence of institutional pressures and gender», European Management Journal, vol. 33, núm. 3, págs. 214-224.

Perrons, D.; Fagan, C.; Mcdowell, L.; Ray, K. y Ward, K. [2005]: «Work, life and time in the new economy», Time & Society, vol. 14, núm. 1, págs. 51-64.

Pfeffer, J. [1994]: Competitive Advantage through People, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Redmond, J.; Valiulis, M. y Drew, E. [2006]: Literature review of issues related to work-life balance, workplace culture and maternity/childcare issues, Crisis Pregnancy Agency Report, núm. 16.

Scott, W. [1994]: «Institutional analysis: variance and process theory approaches», Scott, R. y Meyer, J. (eds.), Institutional environments and organizations, Sage publications.

— [1991]: «Unpacking institutional arguments», Powell, W. y DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, The university of Chicago press.

Scott, W. R. [1995]: Institutions and organizations (2.ª ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Sekiguchi, T. [2013]: «Theoretical implications from the case of performance-based human resource management practices in Japan: management fashion, institutionalization and strategic human resource management perspectives», International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 24, núm. 3, págs. 471-486.

Selznick, P. [1957]: Leadership in Administration, New York: Harper and Row.

Solera, C. [2009]: «Combining Marriage and Children with Paid Work: Changes across Cohorts in Italy and Britain», Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol. 40, núm. 4, págs. 635-659.

Straub, C. [2007]: «A comparative analysis of the use of work-life balance practices in Europe», Women in Management Review, vol. 22, núm. 4, págs. 289-304.

Teece, D.; Pisano, O. y Shuen, A. [1997]: «Dynamic capabilities and strategic management», Strategic Management Journal, vol. 8, págs. 509-553.

Tobio Soler, C. [2013]: «Estado y familia en el cuidado de las personas: sustitución o complemento», Cuadernos de relaciones laborales, vol. 31, núm. 1, págs. 17-38.

Tomlinson, J. [2007]: «Employment regulation, welfare and gender regimes: a comparative analysis of women's working-time patterns and work-life balance in the UK and the US», The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 18, núm. 3, págs. 401-415.

Van Der Lippe, T.; De Ruijter, J.; De Ruijter, E. y Raub, W. [2010]: «Persistent inequalities in time use between men and women: a detailed look at the influence of economic circumstances, policies and culture», European Sociological Review, vol. 26, núm. 2.

Wernerfecf, B. [1984]: «A resource based view of the firm», Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, págs. 171-180.

Wright, P. M. y McMahan, G. C. [1992]: «Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management», Journal of Management, vol. 18, núm. 2, págs. 295-320.

Published

2017-10-07

How to Cite

Lucia Casademunt, A. M., Oteros Ruiz, M. J., & Martínez Cousinou, G. (2017). Do the welfare state models affect work-life balance for female worker with children? The moderator role of gender as cultural value in Europe. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (415), 215–248. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2017.1774