Telecommuting: has anything changed after Law 10/2021 for some companies?

Commentary on National Court Judgment 62/2024, 3 June

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2025.24407

Keywords:

collective action; remote work, voluntary work, individual remote work agreement, distribution of remote and in-person work time, collective bargaining, expense compensation, days off

Abstract

The factual basis of this judicial ruling lies in the regulation of remote work, specifically in the regulatory transition that occurred between the COVID-19 pandemic and the regulation given to this contractual modality under Law 10/2021, of July 9. The legal analysis focuses its attention on the unilateral modification of the individual agreement between the parties of the remote work contract regarding the establishment of the percentage and distribution between in-person and remote work time, as well as the compensation of economic expenses compensated in the case by equivalent rest periods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-04-01 — Updated on 2025-05-07

Versions

How to Cite

Trillo Párraga, F. J. (2025). Telecommuting: has anything changed after Law 10/2021 for some companies? Commentary on National Court Judgment 62/2024, 3 June. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (486), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2025.24407 (Original work published April 1, 2025)