The constitutional significance of workplace harassment in the civil service and the evidentiary assessment of harassment in judicial proceedings

Commentary on Constitutional Court Ruling 28/2025, of 10 February

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2025.24527

Keywords:

workplace harassment, burden of proof, constitutional doctrine, public officials

Abstract

The STC 28/2025, after summarizing the normative framework and constitutional doctrine on workplace harassment, declares violated the fundamental right to physical and moral integrity (art. 15 Spanish Constitution) and the right to effective judicial protection of public officials (art. 24 Spanish Constitution) condemning the city council, both for failing to comply with the positive obligation to prevent, investigate and punish harassment actions, and for active harassment conduct. It also quash the appeal judgment for breach of its duty of judicial control over these rights on the basis of a correct application of constitutional case-law on shifting the burden of proof in their protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-06-12 — Updated on 2025-07-04

Versions

How to Cite

Navarro Nieto, F. (2025). The constitutional significance of workplace harassment in the civil service and the evidentiary assessment of harassment in judicial proceedings: Commentary on Constitutional Court Ruling 28/2025, of 10 February. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (487), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2025.24527 (Original work published June 12, 2025)