Reviewers

For the review of submissions to the Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. CEF, two reviewers (a third, in cases of discrepancy) will be selected according to their area of specialization (which guarantees a value judgment based on expert knowledge of the subject).

Reviewers will act under the criteria of impartiality, objectivity, promptness, confidentiality, respect and acknowledgement of uncited sources. They must work in solidarity with the publishing line drawn and declare possible conflicts of interest. Furthermore, reviewers are external to the author's institution, as well as to the committees and publishing bodies of the journal.

Reviewers commit:

  • To make a fair and objective review of the articles.
  • To respect the evaluation deadlines established in the journal's publication rules.
  • To clearly state the arguments for their assessment.
  • Not to accept any articles for review in which there might be a conflict of interest that would limit their objectivity.
  • To refuse to review an article if they do not feel technically qualified.
  • To maintain the confidentiality of the information and data of the evaluated articles.
  • To accurately indicate the bibliographical references of fundamental works that may have been overlooked by the author(s).
  • To inform the publishing house of any similarity or overlap of the manuscript with other published works.
  • To evaluate manuscripts solely on their intellectual content, without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, nationality or political philosophy of the authors.
  • Not to use information, data, theories or interpretations of the manuscript for their own benefit or that of others, nor to harm third parties. Only in special cases may they seek the advice of other specialists in the field and they shall inform the journal's Management of such circumstances.

The journal has a database for internal use that processes and registers the transfer of articles and the set of reviewers. The list of reviewers in the one-year review period will be published thereafter. Evaluators receive an annual certificate of participation as reviewers of the publication, regardless of the number of articles they have reviewed per year.

Guide for reviewers

Reviewer's qualifications

Reviewers must have the academic qualification of a PhD or be an expert in the thematic focus of the journal: Labour and Social Security Law and Human Resources.

Candidates should send a brief updated curriculum vitae (maximum one page, with the most relevant academic achievements) to revistatss@udima.es, including their academic identifiers (ORCID, Google Scholar, Scopus, Academia.edu, Publons, etc.). The Publishing Board will review the proposal and inform the interested party.

Revisores/as participantes en el año 2023

Alberto Blasco Hernando

 

Álvaro Rodríguez de la Calle

 

Ana de la Puebla Pinilla

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet Ver perfil Scopus

Ana María Calles Doñate

Ver perfil Dialnet Ver perfil Scopus

Antonio Ojeda Avilés

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet Ver perfil Scopus

Carmen Sánchez Trigueros

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet Ver perfil Scopus Ver perfil Google Scholar

Carolina Martínez Moreno

Ver perfil ORCID

Charo García González

 

Cristina Samsó Sánchez

 

Eduardo Guillamón Estornell

 

Eduardo Rojo Torrecilla

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

Eva Cifre Gallego

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

Ignacio Carvajal Gómez-Cano

 

Jesús Rafael Mercader Uguina

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

Jesús Torres Mateos

Ver perfil Dialnet

Jordi García Viña

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

José Ángel Zúñiga Vicente

Ver perfil ORCID

José Eduardo López Ahumada

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

José Luis Tortuero Plaza

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

José María Peiró Silla

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

Juan García Blasco

Ver perfil ORCID

Juan López Gandía

Ver perfil Dialnet

Juan Sánchez Rodríguez

 

María José López Álvarez

Ver perfil ORCID

María José Sánchez García

 

María Luisa Molero Marañón

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

Miguel Ángel Purcalla Bonilla

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

Mónica Gil Ginestar

 

Sofía Olarte Encabo

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet

Susana Rodríguez Escanciano

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet Ver perfil Scopus Ver perfil Google Scholar

Vicente Martínez Tur

Ver perfil ORCID Ver perfil Dialnet Ver perfil Scopus Ver perfil Google Scholar