Suitable procedural strategy for the defense against harassment in the workplace: criminal or labor jurisdiction?

Commentary on Supreme Court Judgment, Criminal Division, 45/2021, of January 21

Authors

  • Fernando de Vicente Pachés Profesor titular de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Universidad Jaume I (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2021.2448

Keywords:

prevention and health, violence and harassment at work, psychosocial work risk, ILO Convention 190, criminal and labour jurisdiction

Abstract

The Supreme Court Judgment 45/2021, of January 21, considers that it is not appropriate to estimate the existence of the crime of harassment at work because of the lack of a note of gravity, a qualification requirement necessary for the conduct to be punished criminally. Probably, these same acts of harassment in the area of social jurisdiction –due to non-compliance with risk prevention regulations– would deserve a different judicial ruling. Should the victim for the success of her claim go to the social jurisdiction?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-09-07

How to Cite

de Vicente Pachés, F. (2021). Suitable procedural strategy for the defense against harassment in the workplace: criminal or labor jurisdiction? Commentary on Supreme Court Judgment, Criminal Division, 45/2021, of January 21. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (461-462), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2021.2448