Congruencia de la demanda con la papeleta de conciliación y protección frente al despido de la mujer embarazada: un ejemplo de flexibilización: Comentario a la Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid 1151/2022, de 23 de diciembre

Margarita Miñarro Yanini

doi:10.51302/rtss.2023.18715

Congruence of the demand with the conciliation and protection ballot against the dismissal of the pregnant woman: an example of flexibility

Commentary on the Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Madrid 1151/2022, of 23 December

Authors

Margarita Miñarro Yanini Profesora titular de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Universidad Jaume I (Castelló, España) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-3595

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2023.18715

Keywords:

labor process, conciliation, lawsuit, procedural moment, allegation, procedure, pregnancy

Abstract

This jurisprudential comment examines the Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Madrid of December 23, 2022 (Num. 1151/2022), in relation to the admissibility of a claim for nullity of the dismissal based on a fact, pregnancy, not alleged in prior administrative conciliation or in the lawsuit initial, but only in the writ of expansion of the claim.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2023-03-23 — Updated on 2023-04-28

Versions

2023-04-28 (2)
2023-03-23 (1)

How to Cite

Miñarro Yanini, M. (2023). Congruence of the demand with the conciliation and protection ballot against the dismissal of the pregnant woman: an example of flexibility: Commentary on the Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Madrid 1151/2022, of 23 December. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (474), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2023.18715 (Original work published March 23, 2023)