La prueba de las horas extraordinarias: ¿una sentencia gatopardista (o lampedusiana)? Comentario a la Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia 290/2023, de 28 de marzo

Juan Gorelli Hernández

doi:10.51302/rtss.2023.19233

The overtime test: a gatopardist (or lampedusian) ruling?

Commentary on the Ruling of the Superior Court of Justice of Murcia 290/2023, of 28 March

Authors

Juan Gorelli Hernández Catedrático de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Universidad de Huelva (España) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-3068

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2023.19233

Keywords:

working time, overtime, daily record of the working day, record of overtime, proof

Abstract

The commented judgment reiterates one of the traditional problems of labor law: the proof of overtime. Said problem worsens with the introduction of the irregular working day in our productive system; although it intends to be resolved with the daily record of the working day. The question raised in this judgment is precisely the problem of the company's lack of registration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Furgonota de mensajería con un fondo de paquetes y fichas de madera de tiendas conectadas entre sí

Downloads

Requires Subscription PDF (Español (España))

Published

2023-07-13 — Updated on 2023-09-06

Versions

2023-09-06 (2)
2023-07-13 (1)

How to Cite

Gorelli Hernández, J. (2023). The overtime test: a gatopardist (or lampedusian) ruling? Commentary on the Ruling of the Superior Court of Justice of Murcia 290/2023, of 28 March. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (476), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2023.19233 (Original work published July 13, 2023)