The 90 days determining collective redundancy: certus an, ¿certus quando?

Commentary on the judgment of the ECJ 11 November 2020, case C-300/19

Authors

  • Yolanda Maneiro Vázquez Profesora contratada doctora de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2021.2300

Keywords:

collective dismissal, 90 days, dies a quo, article 51.1 ET, Directive 98/59/EC

Abstract

The Marclean Technologies judgment clarifies the time frame within which the 90-day period for counting redundancies must be calculated when determining whether or not a collective redundancy exists. In it, the Court of Justice does not consider that the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court is in accordance with Directive 98/59/EC and offers a much wider interpretation of this time period, but which, at the same time, opens many questions about its future application and highlights the urgent need to reform article 51.1 ET.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-01-07

How to Cite

Maneiro Vázquez, Y. (2021). The 90 days determining collective redundancy: certus an, ¿certus quando? Commentary on the judgment of the ECJ 11 November 2020, case C-300/19. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (454), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2021.2300