Equal salary for work of equal value: what part of the principle is not understood in the public university for doctoral research personnel?

Commentary on Supreme Court Ruling 426/2024, March 6

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2024.22355

Keywords:

universities, research, research personnel, equal pay, community law, employment contracts, collective bargaining

Abstract

The financial system of university research, which requires public universities to continually attend external calls to attract financial resources and research talent, multiplies the diversity of contractual employment situations of research personnel. This financial difference in calls comes, with some frequency, in conflict with the principle of equal pay. Hence the many collective conflicts that demand equal pay, the expansive nature of which is affirmed in jurisprudence. This, however, usually makes a broad judgment about the reasonableness of these differences, despite finding a basis in the recent laws of science and universities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-06-13 — Updated on 2024-07-02

Versions

How to Cite

Molina Navarrete, C. (2024). Equal salary for work of equal value: what part of the principle is not understood in the public university for doctoral research personnel? Commentary on Supreme Court Ruling 426/2024, March 6. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (481), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2024.22355 (Original work published June 13, 2024)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>