The prescription in the review of rights declaration acts and in the reimbursement of improperly perceived benefits. An occasional lawsuit that sometimes complicates the social courts
Commentary on Supreme Court ruling 61/2021, of January 19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2021.2382Keywords:
review of declaration acts, benefits’ reimbursement, prescriptionAbstract
The declarative act of rights review that is successful implies the reimbursement of benefits unduly received. But this reinstatement does not presuppose the review of the declarative act in any case. Both contexts are typified in the procedural and substantive rules and both of them share the same prescription period. It is clear that there are different scenarios and their application cannot be confused neither combined at convenience before administrative offices or judicial courts. The procedural term contained in the rule subordinates the exercise of the judicial action and the substantive one the temporary limit for the benefit reimbursement.
Supporting Agencies
Trabajo realizado en el marco del proyecto coordinado y financiado por el MINECO, con ref. DER2017-83040-C4-1-R, titulado «Hacia un nuevo modelo de Derecho transnacional del trabajo» y proyecto de grupos, con ref. UPV/EHU GIU18/082, titulado «Derecho transnacional de trabajo y transporte», dirigidos –ambos– por Olga Fotinopoulou Basurko
Downloads
