Diálogo a dos voces: ¿quién paga la «cuota empresarial» en las ayudas Margarita Salas y María Zambrano y qué orden jurisdiccional es competente? Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León 884/2023, de 29 de mayo, versus Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia 1153/2022, de 30 de noviembre, versus Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia 4061/2023, de 22 de septiembre

Fernando Ballester Laguna; Cristóbal Molina Navarrete

doi:10.51302/rtss.2023.19653

Dialogue with two voices: who bears the employer’s Social Security contributions in the Margarita Salas and María Zambrano grants, and which jurisdiction holds competence?

Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Castilla y León 884/2023, of 29 May, versus Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Murcia 1153/2022, of 30 November, versus Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Galicia 4061/2023, of 22 September

Authors

Fernando Ballester Laguna Catedrático de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Universidad de Alicante (España) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-0630
Cristóbal Molina Navarrete Catedrático de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Universidad de Jaén (España) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8830-6941

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2023.19653

Keywords:

public universities, Social Security contribution, Margarita Salas grants, María Zambrano grants, collective conflicts, competent jurisdiction, research staff

Abstract

This contribution is a two-part analysis of the problems raised by the Margarita Salas and María Zambrano grants regarding the imputation of the employer's Social Security contributions and the competent jurisdiction, with divergent positions as far as the substantive issue is concerned.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Mujer ejecutiva con traje diplomática y portafolios

Downloads

Requires Subscription PDF (Español (España))

Published

2023-10-26 — Updated on 2023-11-07

Versions

2023-11-07 (2)
2023-10-26 (1)

How to Cite

Ballester Laguna, F., & Molina Navarrete, C. (2023). Dialogue with two voices: who bears the employer’s Social Security contributions in the Margarita Salas and María Zambrano grants, and which jurisdiction holds competence? Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Castilla y León 884/2023, of 29 May, versus Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Murcia 1153/2022, of 30 November, versus Ruling of the High Court of Justice of Galicia 4061/2023, of 22 September. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (477), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2023.19653 (Original work published October 26, 2023)