Irrelevance of the source of the permanent disability pension (common illness or non-occupational accident) in accessing the right to a minimum wage supplement
Commentary on Supreme Court Ruling 1007/2024, of July 10
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2025.24441Keywords:
permanent total disability, minimum benefit supplement, common illness, non-occupational accident, contingency, healthcare natureAbstract
The question at issue in Supreme Court Judgment 1007/2024, dated July 10, is whether a beneficiary under 60 years of a total permanent incapacity pension, resulting from a non-occupational accident, may be entitled to minimum supplement, as if it were a common illness, while complying with the conditions of Article 59 of the General Social Security Law established in order to entitle to the above-mentioned supplement. On this issue, the final resolution of the Supreme Court, by means of a teleological interpretation, clarifies the extension of the right to minimum allowance to beneficiaries of total permanent disability resulting from non-occupational accidents under 60 years.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-05-07 (2)
- 2025-04-29 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francisco Javier Fernández Orrico

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.












