La fortaleza del sistema de recursos humanos: un estudio empírico sobre su influencia en el compromiso afectivo del personal de la empresa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2024.18875Palabras clave:
fortaleza del sistema de RR. HH., compromiso afectivo, enfoque contingente, LMX, tamaño organizativo, multinivelResumen
Esta investigación se centra en el proceso de implantación de las estrategias de recursos humanos (RR. HH.) y, en particular, en el concepto de la «fortaleza del sistema de recursos humanos» (FRH), definida a partir de tres características básicas de las estrategias de RR. HH., como son su carácter distintivo, su consenso y su consistencia. En este trabajo nos planteamos analizar el efecto de esta fortaleza sobre el compromiso afectivo colectivo (CAC). Asimismo, pretendemos analizar esta relación desde una perspectiva contingente teniendo en cuenta el efecto moderador del leader-member exchange y del tamaño organizativo en esta relación. El análisis estadístico de los datos obtenidos a partir de una muestra de 142 empresas españolas y 504 empleados clave indica que, una vez controlado el efecto que tienen las prácticas de RR. HH. sobre el CAC de las empresas, la FRH ejerce también un efecto positivo y significativo sobre dicho compromiso afectivo. Además, podemos concluir que esta relación no es la misma para todas las empresas, sino que depende del nivel del LMX que exista en la organización. Es decir, en función de la relación general existente entre los líderes y los subordinados en la organización, el efecto de la FRH sobre el compromiso afectivo de la plantilla variará. En particular, cuando las relaciones entre líderes y seguidores son buenas, el efecto de la FRH en el compromiso afectivo es menor.
Agencias de apoyo
Este trabajo ha sido financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, la Agencia Estatal de Investigación y el FEDER. Proyecto PID2022-141683NB-I00 por MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE.
Descargas
Citas
Allen, N. J. y Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. y Kallenberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off.Cornell University Press.
Bagozzi, R. P. y Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100104
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6, Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software Inc.
Bos-Nehles, A., Conway, E. y Fox, G. (2021). Optimising human resource system strength in nurturing affective commitment: Do all meta-features matter? Human Resource Management Journal, 31(2), 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12320
Bos-Nehles, A. C., Van Riemsdijk, M. J. y Kees Looise, J. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance: applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers' HRM implementation. Human resource management, 52(6), 861-877.
Bowen, D. E. y Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the «strength» of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221.
Bureau van Dijk 2013, https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb
Coelho, J. P., Cunha, R. C., Gomes, J. F. S. y Correia, A. G. (2012). Developing and validating a measure of the strength of the HRM system: Operationalizing the construct and relationships among its dimensions. Working paper, 0562.
Cohen, A., Ben-Tura, E. y Vashdi, D. R. (2012). The relationship between social exchange variables, OCB, and performance: what happens when you consider group characteristics? Personnel Review, 41(6), 705-731.
Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A. y Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
Dunegan, K. J., Duchon, D. y Uhl-Bien, M. (1992). Examining the link between leader member exchange and subordinate performance: The role of task analyzability and variety as moderators. Journal of Management, 18(1), 59-76.
Farndale, E. y Sanders, K. (2017). Conceptualizing HRM system strength through a cross-cultural lens. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 132-148.
Frenkel, S. J., Li, M. y Restubog, S. L. D. (2012). Management, organizational justice and emotional exhaustion among Chinese migrant workers: Evidence from two manufacturing firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(1), 121-147.
Frenkel, S. J. y Yu, C. (2011). Managing coworker assistance through organizational identification. Human Performance, 24(5), 387-404.
Gardner, T. M., Wright, P. M. y Moynihan, L. M. (2011). The impact of motivation, empowerment, and skill-enhancing practices on aggregate voluntary turnover: The mediating effect of collective affective commitment. Personnel psychology, 64(2), 315-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01212.x
Graen, G. B. y Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Guan, X. y Frenkel, S. (2018). How HR practice, work engagement and job crafting influence employee performance. Chinese Management Studies, 12(3), 591-607. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-11-2017-0328
Hauff, S., Alewell, D. y Katrin Hansen, N. (2017). HRM system strength and HRM target achievement-toward a broader understanding of HRM processes. Human Resource Management, 56(5), 715-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21798
Heffernan, M., Cafferkey, K., Harney, B., Townsend, K. y Dundon, T. (2022). HRM system strength and employee well-being: the role of internal process and open systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60(1), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12302
Heffernan, M. y Dundon, T. (2016). Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems (HPWS) and employee well-being: the mediating effect of organisational justice. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12095
Hewett, R., Shantz, A., Mundy, J. y Alfes, K. (2018). Attribution theories in human resource management research: A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 87-126.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386-408.
Johns, G. (2018). Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 5, 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104406
Joo, B.-K. (2010). Organizational commitment for knowledge workers: the roles of perceived organizational learning culture, leader-member exchange quality, and turnover intention. Human resource development quarterly, 21(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20031
Katou, A. A., Budhwar, P. S. y Patel, C. (2014). Content vs. process in the HRM-performance relationship: An empirical examination. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21606
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska symposium on motivation, 192-238.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107-128.
Kozlowski, S. W. J. y Klein, K. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research on organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. En K. J. Klein y S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). Jossey-Bass.
Lepak, D. P. y Snell, S. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31-48.
Li, X. (2021). Putting perceived HR credibility into the HRM process picture: insights from the elaboration likelihood model. Handbook on HR process research, 83-98.
Li, X., Frenkel, S. J. y Sanders, K. (2011). Strategic HRM as process: How HR system and organizational climate strength influence Chinese employee attitudes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(9), 1.825-1.842. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.573965
Lind, E. A. y van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24006-X
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A. y Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121.
Mathieu J. E. y Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 141-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.436
Melcher, A. J. (1976). Structure and process of organizations, a systems approach. Englewood Cliffs.
Ostroff, C. y Bowen, D. E. (2016). Reflections on the 2014 decade award: is there strength in the construct of HR system strength? Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 196-214. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0323
Ostroff, C. y Bowen, D. E. (2000). Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness, En J. K. Klein y S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp.211-266). Jossey-Bass.
Peccei, R., Van De Voorde, K. y van Veldhoven, M. (2013). HRM, well-being and performance: A theoretical and empirical review. En J. Paauwe, D. Guest y P. Wright (Eds.), HRM & performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 15-46). Wiley-Blackwell.
Pereira, C. M. M. y Gomes, J. F. S. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: impact on organisational performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 4.301-4.318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667434
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. y Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14516251/
Reis, H. T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308321721
Roberson, Q. M. y Williamson, I. O. (2012). Justice in self-managing teams: the role of social networks in the emergence of procedural justice climates, Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 685-701. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0491
Rosen, C. C., Harris, K. J. y Kacmar, K. M. (2011). LMX, context perceptions, and performance: An uncertainty management perspective. Journal of Management, 37(3), 819-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365727
Sanders, K., Bednall, T. C. y Yang, H. (2021). HR strength: Past, current and future research, Handbook on HR process research, 27-45. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100079.00010
Sanders, K., Shipton, H. y Gomes, J. F. S. (2014). Guest editors' introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21644
Sanders, K. y Yang, H. (2016). The HRM process approach: The influence of employees' attribution to explain the HRM-performance relationship. Human Resource Management, 55(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21661
Stanton, P., Young, S., Bartram, T. y Leggat, S. G. (2010). Singing the same song: translating HRM messages across management hierarchies in Australian hospitals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(4), 567-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585191003612075
Steffensen Jr., D. S., Ellen III, B. P., Wang, G. y Ferris, G. R. (2019). Putting the «management» back in human resource management: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2.387-2.418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318816179
Van de Voorde, K., Paauwe, J. y Van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Employee well-being and the HRM-organizational performance relationship: a review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 391-407.
Van Rossenberg, Y. G., Cross, D. y Swart, J. (2022). An HRM perspective on workplace commitment: Reconnecting in concept, measurement and methodology. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), 891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100891
Whitman, D. S., Caleo, S., Carpenter, N. C., Horner, M. T. and Bernerth, J. B. (2012). Fairness at the collective level: a meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 776-791. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028021
Descargas
Publicado
Versiones
- 01-03-2024 (2)
- 14-02-2024 (1)
