Antecedents and consequences of proactive behavior in the firm: a multilevel model

Authors

  • Inmaculada Beltrán Martín Profesora Titular del Departamento de Administración de Empresas y Marketing. Universitat Jaume I (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2013.3174

Keywords:

proactive behavior, self-efficacy, role orientation, human resource practices, strategic flexibility, financial results, multilevel model

Abstract

In current competitive environments, organizations can not specify in advance which employee behaviors are needed to achieve organizational objectives. Instead, firms need proactive employees to guarantee organizational success. The purpose of the present study is to understand what predicts employee proactive behavior and which consequences these behaviors have for the firm. In this research we analyze whether certain employees will show higher proactivity depending on a set of individual variables. In addition, we want to examine whether human resource practices influence proactive behavior and to what extent this relationship is mediated by employee self-efficacy and role orientation. Finally, we will study the impact of proactive behaviors on organizational effectiveness, in particular on strategic flexibility and financial results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amabile, T. M.; Hill, K. G.; Hennessey, B. A. y Tighe, E. [1994]: «The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations», Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, págs. 950-967.

Axtell, C. M.; Holman, D. J.; Unsworth, K. L.; Wall, T. D.; Waterson, P. E. y Hurrington, E. [2000]: «Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas», Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, págs. 265-285.

Axtell, C. M. y Parker, S. K. [2003]: «Promoting role breadth self-efficacy through involvement, work redesign and training», Human Relations, 56, págs. 112-131.

Baer, M. y Frese, M. [2003]: «Innovation is not enough: Climate for initiative and psychological safety, process innovation, and firm performance», Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, págs. 45-68.

Bailey, T.; Berg, P. y Sandy, C. [2001]: «The effect of high performance work practices on employee earnings in the steel, apparel, and medical electronics and imaging industries», Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, págs. 525-543.

Bandura, A. [1986]: Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive view, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Chen, G.; Gully, S. M.; Whiteman, J. A. y Kilcullen, R. N. [2000]: «Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance», Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, págs. 835-847.

Crant, J. M. [2000]: «Proactive behavior in organizations», Journal of Management, 26, págs. 435-462.

De Toni, A. y Tonchia, S. [2005]: «Definitions and linkages between operational and strategic flexibilities», Omega, 33, págs. 525-540.

Dyer, L. y Reeves, T. [1995]: «Human resource strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go?», International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6, págs. 656-670.

Fay, D. y Frese, M. [2001]: «The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies», Human Performance, 14, págs. 97-124.

Frese, M. y Fay, D. [2001]: «Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century». En Staw, B. M. y Sutton, R. J. (eds.): Research in Organizational Behavior, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Frese, M.; Fay, D.; Hilburger, T.; Leng, K. y Tag, A. [1997]: «The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples», Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 70, págs. 139-161.

Frese, M.; Kring, W.; Soose, A. y Zempel, J. [1996]: «PI at work: Differences between East and West Germany», Academy of Management Journal, 39, págs. 37-63.

Frese, M.; Teng, E. y Wijnen, C. J. D. [1999]: «Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies», Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, págs. 1.139-1.155.

Friedrich, A.; Kabst, R.; Weber, W. y Rodehuth, M. [1998]: «Functional flexibility: Merely reacting or acting strategically?», Employee Relations, 20, págs. 504-523.

Fritz, C. y Sonnentag, S. [2009]: «Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: A look at job stressors and positive affect during the workday», Journal of Management, 35, págs. 94-111.

Gardner, T. M.; Moynihan, L. M.; Park, H. J. y Wright, P. M. [2001]: Beginning to unlock the black box in the HR firm performance relationship: The impact of HR practices on employee attitudes and employee outcomes, CAHRS Working Paper Series, n.º 6, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Gist, M. E. y Mitchell, T. R. [1992]: «Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability», Academy of Management Review, 17, págs. 183-211.

Grant, A. M. y Ashford, S. J. [2008]: «The dynamics of proactivity at work», Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, págs. 3-34.

Grewal, R. y Tansuhaj, P. [2001]: «Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility», Journal of Marketing, 65, págs. 67-80.

Guest, D. E. y Conway, N. [2002]: «Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective», Human Resource Management Journal, 12, págs. 22-38.

Hitt, M. A.; Bierman, L.; Shimizu, K. y Kochhar, R. [2001]: «Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and firm performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective», Academy of Management Journal, 44, págs. 13-28.

House, R.; Rousseau, D. M. y Thomas-Hunt, M. [1995]: «The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior», Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, págs. 41-114.

Howell, J. M. y Boies, K. [2004]: «Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence», The Leadership Quarterly, 15, págs. 123-143.

Malhotra, N. y Morris, T. [2009]: «Heterogeneity in professional service firms», Journal of Management Studies, 46, págs. 895-922.

Martínez, A.; Vela, M. J.; Pérez, M. y De Luis, P. [2007]: «Flexibilidad e innovación: el efecto moderador de la cooperación», Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16, págs. 69-88.

Mitchell, T. R. y Daniels, D. [2003]: «Motivation». En Borman, W. C.; Ilgen, D. R.; Klimoski, R. J. y Weiner, I. B. (eds.): Handbook of Psychology, vol. 12, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York: Wiley.

Nadkarni, S. y Narayanan, V. K. [2007]: «Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed», Strategic Management Journal, 2, págs. 243-270.

Ng, T. W. H. y Feldman, D. C. [2010]: «Organizational tenure and job performance», Journal of Management, 36, págs. 1.220-1.250.

Ohly, S. y Fritz, C. [2007]: «Challenging the status quo: What motivates proactive behavior?», Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, págs. 623-629.

Ostroff, C. y Bowen, D. E. [2000]: «Moving human resource to a higher level. Human resource practices and organizational effectiveness». En Klein, K. y Kozlowski, S. W. (eds.): Multi-level Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Pallarés, M. [2007]: «Proactividad y éxito profesional», AreaRH.com.

Parker, S. K. [1998]: «Role breadth self-efficacy: Relationship with work enrichment and other organizational practices», Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, págs. 835-852.

— [2000]: «From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientation and role breadth self-efficacy», Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, págs. 447-469.

Parker, S. K. y Wall, T. D. [1998]: Job and work design: Organizing work to promote well-being and effectiveness, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Parker, S. K.; Wall, T. D. y Jackson, P. R. [1997]: «That's not my job: Developing flexible employee work orientations», Academy of Management Journal, 40, págs. 899-929.

Parker, S. K.; Williams, H. M. y Turner, N. [2006]: «Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work», Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, págs. 636-652.

Schneider, B.; White, S. S. y Paul, M. C. [1998]: «Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Test of a causal model», Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, págs. 150-163.

Seibert, S. E.; Kraimer, M. L. y Crant, J. N. [2001]: «What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success», Personnel Psychology, 54, págs. 845-874.

Shafer, R. A.; Dyer, L.; Kitty, J.; Amos, J. y Ericksen, J. [2001]: «Crafting a human resource strategy to foster organizational agility: A case study», Human Resource Management, 40, págs. 197-211.

Stajkovic, A. D. y Luthans, F. [1998]: «Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis», Psychological Bulleting, 124, págs. 240-261.

Unsworth, K. L. y Parker, S. K. [2003]: «Proactivity and innovation: Promoting a new workforce for the new workplace». En Holman, D.; Wall, T. D.; Clegg, C. W.; Sparrow, P. y Howard, A. (eds.): The New Workplace. A Guide to the Human Impact of Modern Working Practices, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

Volberda, H. W. [1996]: «Toward the flexible firm: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments», Organization Science, 7, págs. 359-374.

Warr, P. B.; Cook, J. D. y Wall, T. D. [1979]: «Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being», Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, págs. 129-148.

Published

2013-09-07

How to Cite

Beltrán Martín, I. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of proactive behavior in the firm: a multilevel model. Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (365-366), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2013.3174

Most read articles by the same author(s)